Legal Opinion

Matter of Marra

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2004No. 02-147Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 02-147 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

2004 MT 8

___________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF ) JOSEPH MARRA, ) OPINION an Attorney at Law, ) & ) ORDER Respondent. ) ___________________________________ ¶1 On April 22, 2003, the Montana Supreme Court Commission on Practice (the Commission) filed its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation regarding the Complaint filed against Respondent Joseph Marra (Marra). The Commission concluded that Marra violated Rule 1.10 of the Montana Rules of Professional Conduct (M.R.P.C.), when he and his firm undertook dual…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coalition for Canyon Preservation v. Karl S. Bowers, Administrator, Federal Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & SonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Grievance Committee v. RottnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  5. Goldstein v. Commission on Practice of the Supreme CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API