Teitler v. Teitler

—In an action, inter alia, to declare a reimbursement provision in the parties’ separation agreement void and unenforceable as against public policy, and to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated December 12, 1996, as granted the defendant summary judgment (1) with respect to the second cause of action insofar as the court declared the reimbursement provision to be valid and enforceable as interpreted, and (2) with respect to the third cause of action which…