Legal Opinion

Smith Chapel Baptist Church v. City of Durham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 30, 1998No. 250PA97PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The defendant contends that two sections of the General Statutes give the City of Durham the authority to assess fees to operate its stormwater program, although a large part of the program expenditures do not involve the physical assets of the program.

N.C.G.S. § 160A-311 provides in part:

As used in this Article, the term “public enterprise” includes:(10) Structural and natural stormwater and drainage systems of all types.

N.C.G.S. § 160A-311 (1994).

N.C.G.S. § 160A-314(al) provides in part:

The fees established under this subsection must be made applicable throughout the area of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Homebuilders Ass'n of Charlotte, Inc. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. DellingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith Chapel Baptist Church v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Bolt v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Bolt v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. SMITH CHAPEL BAPTIST v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Smith Chapel Baptist Church v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API