Legal Opinion

In the Matter Of: The Suspension of Richard L. Pipkins, Attorney at Law

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 1, 1998No. 98-16113PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

On July 16, 1998, this court issued an order directing appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days from entry of the order challenged on appeal. Appellant has responded to the order to show cause.

The record reflects that the district court was not a party to the attorney disciplinary proceedings in the district court, and that it is consequently not a party to this appeal from the order issued in those proceedings. See In re: O’Bryan, 399 F.2d 916 (10th Cir.1968) (district court order in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. In the Matter Pertaining to W. H. 'Pat' O'BryanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re: BarrishCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API