Legal Opinion

Teamsters National Freight Industry Negotiating Committee ex rel. Teamster Local Union Nos. 116, 120, 123, 346, & 544 v. MME, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 27, 1997No. 95-3533PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Midwest Motor Express and other defendants appeal the district court’s decision denying their Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 motion for sanctions against the plaintiff. We affirm.

Plaintiff filed this civil RICO suit alleging the defendants conspired to commit a pattern of racketeering activities in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(a), (c), and (d); the alleged predicate acts included embezzlement, theft, and mail and wire fraud.

The defendants moved to dismiss arguing, inter alia, that plaintiff failed to adequately plead the predicate acts of mail and wire fraud. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Carol J. Pope, Gwen G. Caranchini v. Federal Express Corporation Danny R. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. Casa De Cambio Comdiv, S.A. De C v. V. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, United States of America, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chambers v. PennycookCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. John E. Tuchschmidt v. Outdoor WritersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  3. No. 95-3533Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API