Legal Opinion

Nasco, Inc. v. Calcasieu Television & Radio, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided March 23, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-2564PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAUMAN S. SCOTT, District Judge.

RULING

This matter is before us on an Order to Show Cause why the respondents Calcasieu Television & Radio, Inc. (hereinafter “CTR”) and G. Russell Chambers should not be punished for contempt of court for failure to comply with a preliminary injunction. A hearing was held in open court on December 22, 1983. Upon consideration of the evidence adduced, the parties’ briefs, and arguments of counsel, we dispose of this matter as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. We entered a preliminary injunction on October 24, 1983, which, inter alia, restrained the respondents CTR and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Nasco, Inc. v. Calcasieu Television and Radio, Inc., and G. Russell Chambers, and Richard A. Curry, Edwin A. McCabe and A.J. Gray, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Hinds Cty. Bd. of Sup'rs v. Common CauseMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. MusellaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  5. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API