Legal Opinion

Mississippi Bar v. Pegram

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2014No. 2012-BA-01711-SCTPublished

1Opinion of the Court

CHANDLER, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. In this attorney-discipline case, we affirm the Mississippi Bar Complaint Tribunal’s finding that attorney Joe Pegram violated Mississippi Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1 (Competence). We additionally find that Pegram violated Rule 1.16 (Declining or Terminating Representation). We affirm the Public Reprimand issued by the Complaint Tribunal and additionally order this matter referred to the Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Mississippi Bar for a determination as to whether Pegram should refund as unearned a portion of the flat fee he accepted to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. AplandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  2. Foote v. Mississippi State Bar Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Vining v. Mississippi State Bar Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Asher v. Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  5. The Mississippi Bar v. AlexanderMississippi Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API