Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rongitsch v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 24, 1979No. 49310Published

1DissentWahl, Justice

I agree with the majority’s interpretation of Minn.St.1971, § 242.265, but for reasons stated in my dissent in Vezina v. State of Minnesota, 289 N.W.2d 408 (Minn.1979), filed herewith, I would hold that the Post-conviction Remedy Act does encompass challenges concerning the decision of the Youth Conservation Commission to transfer a person from youthful offender status to adult status.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vezina v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979