Planned Investments, Inc., Michigan Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MERRITT, Circuit Judge.
The issue in this tax case is the adequacy of the notice sent by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS” or “Government”) to inform plaintiff, Planned Investments, Inc. (“PI”) that it had been assessed a penalty of $64,000 under § 6700 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), 26 U.S.C. § 6700, for Pi’s promotion of an abusive tax shelter. The District Court, finding that the notice was inadequate and unfair because it did not clearly specify the time period involved, granted summary judgment to plaintiff and abated the penalty. The Government appeals the grant of summary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Howard S. Scar and Ethel M. Scar v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Wood Harmon Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Jeremiah Benzvi and Robert L. McLeroy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Fred Marvel and Angela Marvel, D/B/A Marvel Photo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Wood Harmon Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- John A. Sage v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Estate of Yaeger v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Hartman v. United States (In Re Hartman)District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Dallin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- McGann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.