Legal Opinion

Alessio v. Carey

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed without costs and the case remitted to that Court for the consideration of issues raised, but not determined, on the appeal below.

Contrary to the Appellate Division’s view, Supreme Court did have subject matter jurisdiction over this special proceeding, brought pursuant to Election Law § 16-106 (5).

Petitioner was a candidate for Town Justice of the Town of Salina, supported by the Democratic and Working Families Parties. Respondent, who had the backing of the Republican, Independence, and Conservative…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MATTER OF LARSEN v. CanaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Testa v. RavitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Larsen v. CanaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MartinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Alessio v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Ragusa v. Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Abramo v. KadetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Matter of Dyer v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API