Legal Opinion

State v. Thacker

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 18, 2013No. 107,549PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Standridge, J.:

Cecil Thacker appeals from the sentence imposed by the district court after he pled no contest to attempted *516tampering with an electronic monitoring device. Thacker claims his sentence was illegal because the underlying felony conviction for which he was being monitored was included in his criminal history for sentencing on the attempted tampering charge. For the reasons stated below, we hold the district court did not err in including Thacker s underlying conviction in his criminal histoiy score for sentencing on the attempted tampering charge.

Facts

In 2009 Thacker was placed on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. State v. VontressSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. State v. LoudermilkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API