Legal Opinion

Chereton v. Armstrong Rubber Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 23, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant’s answer to plaintiff’s complaint raised an issue of fact that was not met by plaintiff’s affidavit in support of its motion for summary judgment. So, regardless of the insufficiency of defendant’s counter-affidavit, there remained a genuine issue of fact which should have been tried by a jury.

Accordingly, the summary judgment in favor of plaintiff should be and it is hereby reversed under the authority of Williams v. City of Lake City, Fla. 1953, 62 So.2d 732, Wilson v. Bachrach, Fla.1953, 65 So.2d 546, and similar cases.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

DREW, C.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of Lake CitySupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Wilson v. BachrachSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Emile v. First National Bank of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  2. National Exhibition Company v. BallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. Key Bank v. First United Land Title Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. A. & G. Aircraft Service, Inc. v. DrakeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. Algernon Blair Cont. v. Hughes SupplyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API