Legal Opinion

Smith v. Dysard Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 11, 1914No. 5468PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Garnishment; from city court of Atlanta—Judge Beid. October 14, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

1. A garnishing creditor can not complain that the garnishee, to whom the defendant in fi. fa. is largely indebted, pays to the defendant after the service of the summons of garnishment, a sum of money less than the garnishee’s demand against the defendant, and which the garnishee could have held in partial payment of his demand, though the plaintiff in the garnishment may require that the funds so paid to the defendant shall operate to extinguish, pro tanto, the claim of the garnishee against his debtor. If the alleged indebtedness of the defendant to the garnishee is not in fact a just…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adair-Levert Inc. v. Atlanta Envelope Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  2. McDonald v. Redding Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Bank of Tifton v. BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API