Legal Opinion

Allard Cattle Co. v. Colorado & Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 18, 1974No. C-454PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Pringle

Petitioners brought this action to quiet title in themselves as abutting landowners to a 50-foot strip of land lying on either side of a 100-foot right-of-way which is owned and maintained by respondent Railroad Company, hereafter referred to as “the railroad. ’ ’ The trial court determined that the railroad had abandoned the strip of land in question, and that title to the land, therefore, vested in the landowners. Holding that the railroad cannot legally dimmish the width of its right-of-way by abandonment the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court. 33 Colo. App. 39, 516…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Northern Pacific Railroad v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. ElySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Hoff v. Girdler CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  5. Denver & R. G. R. v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Neves v. PotterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. Beaver Park Water, Inc. v. City of VictorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. United States v. Eaton Shale Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1977
  4. Water Rights of Masters Investment Co. v. Irrigationists Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. Phillips Co. v. Southern Pacific Rail Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API