Berticelli v. Huard
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.
This is an action of debt for the balance claimed to be due on a poor debtor’s bond. It was heard by the court with right to except on questions of law reserved. The facts are not in dispute. The judge found for the plaintiff.
The sole question at issue as raised by the exceptions is whether the principal on the bond, Armand Huard, did comply with that condition of the bond which provided that the bond should become void if the respondent did within six months from the time of executing the bond deliver himself into the custody of the keeper of the jail to which he is liable to be committed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hussey v. DanforthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1884
- Jones v. EmersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1880
- Noyes v. PerkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
- Putnam v. FultonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932