Legal Opinion

Wayman v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 9, 1833PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Traverse.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Underwood

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Tayloe proceeded against Wayman, for a forcible entry. The jnrv, on the trial of the warrant, found Wav-J J - - man guilty ; and thereupon the justice of the peace rendered a judgment for restitution,, and for costs.

The warrant was set for trial on the 14th of April, 1831. It seems that Wayman, on the next day, executed a traverse bond, in conformity to the act of assembly regulating proceedings in such cases, and the justice of the peace returned the warrant and bond, together with a transcript of the verdict of the jury and his judgment, to…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Borden v. HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1847
  2. B. & O. R. R. v. VanderwarkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Mayhew v. Kentucky River Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Berry v. TriceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. O'Bannon v. Myers' ExecutorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API