Legal Opinion

In re C.A.P.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1993No. 91-FS-752PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Associate Judge:

Appellant seeks reversal of an adjudication of delinquency based on the trial judge’s finding, after a bench trial, that he was guilty of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle (“UUV”).1 On appeal, he maintains both that the trial judge erred in denying the motion to suppress2 and that the conviction is not supported by sufficient evidence. We affirm.

I

At the suppression hearing, a patrol officer with the United States Capitol Police testified that on December 5, 1990, at approximately 3:20 p.m., she observed a 1987 Buick Skylark traveling along a section of Washington…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Lawrence v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. United States v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Logan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
  2. Speight v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. In re R.K.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. In re D.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API