Legal Opinion
Ross v. Department of Correction of the State
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided February 27, 1998No. CA. No. 96M-03-065 SCDPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DEL PESCO, Judge.
Introduction
The instant action comes before the Court on remand from an appeal by Petitioners Ross and Gattis to the Supreme Court.1 The Supreme Court held: (1) that inmates have a clear statutory right to receive individual copies of Department of Correction (“DOC”) disciplinary rules under 11 Del.C. § 6535; (2) that the Superior Court consider the availability of Petitioners’ application for a writ of mandamus as a form of relief; and (3) that further factual development by the Superior Court is required to determine whether or not the petitioners were…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ross v. Department of Correction of the StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Beeks v. JenningsSuperior Court of Delaware · 2021
- Grayson, II v. MartinSuperior Court of Delaware · 2022
- Hall v. CoupeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
- State v. WincklerSuperior Court of Delaware · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.