Legal Opinion

Hill v. Gaertner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 31, 1958No. 37,512PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dell, Chief Justice.

In this action plaintiff had a verdict for personal injuries. Defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. The trial court granted the former but denied the alternative motion. Plaintiff appeals. The only questions before us relate to defendant’s alleged negligence and plaintiff’s alleged contributory negligence.

At the time of the injury plaintiff, then 26 years old, had occupied with another girl a third-floor apartment in defendant’s building in the city of Minneapolis for nearly 3 months. On the day in question…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Holloman v. Henry Grady Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  4. De Salvo v. Stanley-Mark-Strand Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joynt v. California Hotel & CasinoNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Oakland v. StenlundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. FARMERS & MER. STATE BANK OF LAMBERTON v. EbbesenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API