Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hesse v. Traveler's Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1929No. Appeal, 150Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion bt

Me. Justice Feazee :

Plaintiff sued to recover from defendant the amount of an accident insurance policy insuring her husband against “bodily injuries effected directly and independently of all other causes, through external, violent and accidental means.” A compulsory nonsuit was entered by the trial judge at the close of plaintiff’s case, and the present appeal was taken from the refusal of the court below to take it off.

Deceased was suffering from a diseased kidney, and after several acute attacks a medical examination was made, during which the presence of a kidney…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  3. Paul v. . Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Healey v. Mutual Accident Ass'n of the NorthwestIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Brown v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API