Legal Opinion

State v. Cossio

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 2, 2017No. CR-17-250PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCourtney Hudson Goodson, Associate Justice

hThe State of Arkansas brings this interlocutory appeal from the Pulaski County Circuit Court’s order ruling that testimony regarding the victim’s prior sexual conduct with a third party would be admissible pursuant to the rape-shield statute, Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-42-101(c) (Repl. 1999), and Arkansas Rule of Evidence 411(c)(2)(C) (2016). For reversal, the State argues that the circuit court erred by finding that this evidence was relevant where appellee Miguel Cossio was charged with raping the victim while she was physically helpless. Because the circuit court committed a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gaines v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. State v. ColvinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. Vance v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  5. Farmer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Herren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Hillman v. KellyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2020
  3. Mouton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  4. State of Arkansas v. Roy Nichols, Jr.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2026
  5. State v. CossioSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API