People v. Henderson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that his absence from the Sandoval hearing conducted during his first trial deprived him of the right to be present at a material stage of trial. The record shows that defendant was not present during his first trial’s Sandoval hearing. Defendant’s conviction following that trial was reversed on other grounds (People v Henderson, 162 AD2d 1038). Upon retrial, County Court informed counsel that all of its rulings at the first trial would apply at the second trial. Because no objection *1032was made to the court’s failure to conduct a de…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. FardanNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. JulienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. HendersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. LarkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. SealeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. FullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019