Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Whirlpool Corp.
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided August 4, 2010No. Civil Action 09-0520-WS-BPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the complaint. (Doc. 47). Embedded in the motion is a motion to remand the action to state court. (Id. at 6). The parties have submitted briefs in support of their respective positions, (Docs. 47, 50, 51, 55, 73, 82, 83, 85), and the motion is ripe for resolution. After carefully considering the foregoing and other relevant material in the file, the Court concludes that the motion for leave to amend is due to be granted and that the motion to remand is due to be denied.
BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. SchachtSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- David Brown v. Timothy BudzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DX Print, LLC v. National Center for Life and LibertyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2021
- Glovis Alabama, LLC v. Richway Transportation Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2019
- McNealy v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2022
- Pate v. Baldwin County AlabamaDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2019