Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriquez

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1985No. 85-062PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This case is a direct appeal in which the only error assigned is that the sentence imposed was excessive. That contention is without merit.

In this case, however, the record discloses plain error in that the trial court at the arraignment failed to advise the defendant of his right against self-incrimination. Such a record will not support a finding that the plea was entered voluntarily and intelligently. State v. Tweedy, 209 Neb. 649, 309 N.W.2d 94 (1981); State v. Branch, ante p. 754, 371 N.W.2d 740 (1985); State v. Wright, post p. 847, 374 N.W.2d 26 (1985).

Accordingly, the judgment is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. TweedyNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. BranchNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HuffmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API