Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 2005No. 85039PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Karpinski, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant appeals his convictions by a jury (Count I) for possession of MDMA 1 , a Schedule I drug, in violation of R.C. 2925.11 2 , (Count II) sale of drugs in violation of R.C. 2925.03(A)(1), and (Count III) trafficking in a Schedule I drug in violation of R.C. 2925.03(A)(2). Both Counts II and III carried a “schoolyard” specification. Counts I, II, and III also carried one-year firearm specifications. Defendant was also convicted for possession of criminal tools 3 (Count IV), in violation of R.C. 2923.24. Defendant was sentenced to three years’…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. Daughenbaugh, 16-07-07 (10-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. DiggleOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. OsmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API