Omni Express, Inc. v. Cleveland Express, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Benham, Judge.
The evidence at trial showed that Cleveland Express, Inc. (“Cleveland”), a motor carrier, entered into an interlining agreement (an arrangement by which a common carrier entrusted with cargo intended for a locality not within its authorized service area delivers the cargo to a carrier authorized to serve that area, with fees to be split according to tariffs established by the Interstate Commerce Commission) with Omni Express, Inc. (“Omni”), another motor carrier. Then, at Omni’s direction, Cleveland began delivering freight to another terminal, operated by a different…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brannon Enterprises, Inc. v. DeatonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Wetherington v. Koepenick & Horne, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Fidelity & Casualty Insurance v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Rewis v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grabowski v. Radiology Associates, P.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- SCOTT BROS. INC. v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Leader National Insurance v. Kemp & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Terrell v. HesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Comer v. Nat. Bank of Ga.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.