Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Haines

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1995No. 1994-1485PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 73 Ohio St.3d 125.] SHERMAN ET AL., APPELLEES, v. HAINES, APPELLANT. [Cite as Sherman v. Haines,

1995-Ohio-222.] Statute of Frauds—Oral agreement to pay money in installments is "an agreement that is not to be performed within one year" pursuant to R.C. 1335.05, when—Where time of payment is indefinite, the agreement does not fall within "not to be performed within one year" provision of R.C. 1335.05. An alleged oral agreement to pay money in installments is "an agreement that is not to be performed within one year" pursuant to R.C.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Warner v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Rochester Civic Theatre, Inc. v. Maria RamsayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  3. Sherman v. HainesOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Steward v. SirrineArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Frazer v. FulcherOhio Supreme Court · 1848

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. All Star Land Title v. Surewin Invest., Unpublished Decision (11-2-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API