Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bretz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 17, 1974No. 48340Published

1ConcurrenceRoberts, Judge

I fully concur in the result reached in this cause. Further, I feel that this case presents an excellent example of a problem often encountered in this State.

I refer to the fact that under the dichot-omized system of courts of last resort in Texas, the person seeking relief may well find, despite all his good intentions, that he has placed himself before the wrong tribunal. The “purported appeal” in this cause arose out of a criminal prosecution within the State of Texas; the article entitling the victim of the offense to the restoration of this property is contained within the Code of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ArnoldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Ex Parte CvengrosCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Ex Parte HofmayerTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Texas Vending Commission v. Headquarters Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Lockamy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API