Legal Opinion

Brewster v. Emlet

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 25, 1929No. 29803PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

This is an application to prohibit the trial judge from proceeding further with the hearing of this cause, on the ground that he is without jurisdiction. C. P. arts. 845, 846.

Relator was sued by plaintiff on six promissory notes, given as (part of) the purchase price of certain property, “which was sold to said L. M. Emlet by Morgan Oil Company, Incorporated, on the 19th day of March, 1928, by act before E. A. Motted, notary public.” The notarial act is not annexed to the petition, but was offered in evidence; it declares on its face that the purchaser, L. M. Emlet, defendant in suit and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Succession of SteersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  2. Gravillon v. Richard'sSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1839
  3. Verret v. BonvillainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Zinko v. ZinkoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  2. Succession of DancieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  3. Dupre v. Rochester Ropes, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Burgan v. BurganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  5. Bruney v. BruneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API