Legal Opinion
Boule v. Hutton
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 1, 2004No. 97 Civ. 144(MGC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
The parties to this action dispute whether plaintiffs Claude and René Boulé have proved the elements of their claims under N.Y. Gen. Bus. L. § 349 and their claims of common law unfair competition by business disparagement. These claims were dismissed after a bench trial, see Boulé v. Hutton, 138 F.Supp.2d 491 (S.D.N.Y.2001), but remanded by the Second Circuit for further consideration, see Boulé v. Hutton, 328 F.3d 84 (2d Cir.2003). For the following reasons, plaintiffs have failed to prove their § 349 claims but have proven all of the elements of their…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Cross-Appellant v. mcneil-p.p.c., Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Ruder & Finn Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,479 Samuel Mallis and Franklyn B. Kupferman, Cross-Appellants v. Bankers Trust Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Cynthia Maurizio v. Olivia Goldsmith, AKA Justine Rendal, AKA Randi J. GoldfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- M & T Mortgage Corp. v. WhiteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Trikas v. Universal Card Services Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005