Legal Opinion

Broder v. Charles Pfizer & Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 10, 1971No. 71 Civ. 2876PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GURFEIN, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendants John F. Kelly Associates and John F. Kelly, President (“defendants”) to vacate a default and to enlarge the defendants’ time to answer or otherwise plead.

The amended complaint was served on August 31, 1971* No answer was served. The defendants’ “Statement in Lieu of Brief” explains that counsel was not retained until about September 20, 1971 and that “[bjecause of the vague and general allegations made by plaintiff in his amended complaint, it has not been possible to prepare, file and serve the appropriate motions' within time.” The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Provident Security Life Insurance Company v. John S. GorsuchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. VogelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  3. Albert Levine Associates, Inc. v. KershnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. John F. Meehan and Robert W. Fink A/K/A Meehan & Fink v. John Snow and Judy SnowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  2. BDM, INC. v. Sageco, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  3. United States v. Topeka Livestock Auction, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1975
  4. Hertz v. BerzanskeAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Gulf Coast Fans, Inc. v. Midwest Electronics Importers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API