Legal Opinion

Stephen L. Mudd v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 15, 2005No. 04-1416PublishedCited by 271 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Judge SPENCER joined.

OPINION

MICHAEL, Circuit Judge.

After the Social Security benefits claimant in this case lost at the administrative level, the district court awarded him benefits and awarded his lawyer the agreed-upon contingent fee (twenty-five percent of past-due benefits). The Commissioner of Social Security appeals only the district court’s denial of her motion to alter or amend the fee order. Under the governing statute, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), a district court may award fees to a successful claimant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Smyth ex rel. Smyth v. RiveroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  3. Craig v. SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  4. Kathleen L. Morris v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  5. Ethelle B. Robinson v. John W. Gardner, Secretary, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by271 opinions

  1. Crawford v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Fields v. KijakaziCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  3. Joslyn v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
  4. Crawford v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Ellick v. BarnhartDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006

266 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API