Legal Opinion
Meyers v. Antone
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 7, 1967No. 4006PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Judge.
The controversy before us centers around the following provision contained in a contract of sale for improved realty: “Heating plant to be functioning properly — Entire Unit.” The contract was signed in March 1964 and the deed delivered in June of that year. In November appellees (purchasers) first noticed that the boiler leaked. They subsequently sued appellants for breach of warranty and recovered $780, the cost of purchasing and installing a gas heating system on the premises.
In order to render any judgment for ap-pellees, the trial court had to find that there was a warranty;…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- P. H. Sheehy Co. v. Eastern Importing & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1915
- Thompson v. RectorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Fries, Beall & Sharp Co. v. LivingstoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
- Haviland v. DawsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
- Campbell Music Co. v. SingerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fargo MacHine & Tool Co. v. Kearney & Trecker Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
- Camino Real Mobile Home Park Partnership v. WolfeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Tennessee Carolina Transportation, Inc. v. Strick Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- McCrossin v. Hicks Chevrolet, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- Giant Food, Inc. v. JACK I. BENDER, ETC.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.