Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Daniel Contreras

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 20, 2017No. 16-1721; 16-1914; 16-3375PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Daniel Contreras pleaded guilty to various drug-trafficking offenses in three separately charged criminal cases assigned to three different district judges. When'calculating the guidelines range at sentencing, each district judge applied an upward adjustment 'of two offense levels after finding that Contreras maintained a premises—his home—“for the purpose of manufacturing or distributing a controlled substance.” See U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(12). Contreras appeals his concurrent 87-month sentences, arguing that each judge erred by not comparing the frequency of legal activity to the frequency, of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Daniel MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Juan Flores-OlagueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. Edwin SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Acasio SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. WinfieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Rex A. HopperCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Juan ZamudioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. Randy CraftCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  5. United States v. Fernando Alvarez-CarvajalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API