Legal Opinion

Hicks v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 12, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.

Plaintiff in error was indicted, tried, and convicted for grand -larceny and sentenced to serve two years in the state penitentiary at hard labor. He seeks to be relieved of that judgment on the basis of newly discovered evidence.

The newly discovered evidence was an affidavit made in a Justice of the Peace Court as a predicate for a search warrant to search the premises of the plaintiff in error for the alleged stolen property. It was not discovered until after the trial and judgment, of ■ guilty was rendered. It alleged the true value of the stolen property to be $25.00, while at the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tyson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  2. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  3. Barker v. FrenchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Negron v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Lambert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  4. Escobar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  5. Spencer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API