Legal Opinion
Burciaga v. AAJP 2 Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided February 10, 2025No. 2:23-cv-00981Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 JESSICA BURCIAGA, et al., CASE NO. C23-0981-KKE 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER GRANTING AMENDED MOTION 9 v. FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 10 AAJP 2, INC., 11 Defendant(s). 12 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ amended motion for default judgment. 13 Dkt. No. 29. Plaintiffs Jessica Burciaga, Cielo Jean Gibson, Claudia Sampedro, and Paola Cañas 14 filed the instant action against Defendant AAJP 2, Inc. (“AAJP 2”), alleging claims under the 15 Lanham Act, the Washington Personality Rights Act (“WPRA”), Washington’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.