Sheaffer v. Industrial Commission

The appellant has conceded most of its case. In its brief the state concedes that since the 1964 change in operation instituted by Sheaffer as set forth in the second cause of action “guarantees to employees the minimum wage of $.95 an hour, it is not challenged by the commission as a violation of the minimum wage law.”

Thus, the sole issue remaining on this appeal is whether the facts as set forth in the first cause of action set forth a violation of the minimum-wage law.

The significant difference between the methods of operation under the two causes of action is that in the second there is…