Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. Akiel Troy Taylor

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 13, 2020No. 78812-4Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 78812-4-I ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) AKIEL TROY TAYLOR, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) Appellant. ) ) VERELLEN, J. — Akiel Taylor challenges his convictions for second degree assault and witness tampering. He argues he received constitutionally deficient representation because his counsel failed to investigate his theory of the case. But Taylor failed to present any evidence to support his theory. As a result, Taylor fails to establish counsel’s decision not to investigate was deficient. Additionally, absent any…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. GrierWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Sheldon Sanders v. John Ratelle, Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API