Legal Opinion

Haase v. New York Herald Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1921Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Under the authorities, plaintiff was called upon to show that her neglect to prosecute this action was not unreasonable. (Armstrong v. Star Co., 154 App. Div. 320; Ingri v. Star Co., 134 id. 960; Regan v. Milliken Bros., 123 id. 72.) This the plaintiff has failed to do. The affidavit in opposition is not made by any one having any responsible connection with the litigation, and nothing is stated therein to show that plaintiff has any desire or intention of prosecuting the action. *909(Holtzoff v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Star Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Holtzoff v. Dodge & Olcott Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API