Legal Opinion
State v. Hinshaw
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 19, 2018No. 27985PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtFroelich, J.
{¶ 1} Pursuant to R.C. 2945.67(A) and Crim.R. 12(K), the State of Ohio appeals from an order of the Dayton Municipal Court, which granted Karla Hinshaw's motion to suppress. For the following reasons, the trial court's judgment will be reversed, and the matter will be remanded for further proceedings.
I. Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 2} The evidence at the suppression hearing established the following facts.
{¶ 3} During the afternoon of November 2, 2017, Dayton Police Officer David Klawon received an e-mail identifying individuals who were "wanted" due to an outstanding warrant, and he became…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Maryland v. ShatzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. HahnOhio Court of Appeals · 2021