Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Grumman Aerospace Corp.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided September 12, 1984No. 81-2295-CivPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION CONTAINING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

ARONOVITZ, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE was tried to the Court non-jury. It is a case arising under the Death on the High Seas Act, 46 U.S.C. § 761 et seq. and Federal Admiralty Law, 28 U.S.C. § 1333. The Court has heard the testimony of the lay and expert witnesses, received numerous exhibits, examined the entire Court record, and has heard Oral Argument by respective counsel. Accordingly, there is herewith entered this Court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law based upon the aforegoing.

Findings of Fact

1. On December 12,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Stencel Aero Engineering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Brooks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Trevino v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. Daniel Edward Bynum v. Fmc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Koutsoubos, Spiros, Administrator of the Estate of James Koutsoubos v. Boeing Vertol, Division of the Boeing Company and the Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. Edwin Lees Shaw, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Gary Scott Shaw, Deceased v. Grumman Aerospace CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Moyer v. Klosters RederiDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API