Legal Opinion

State v. Absher

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1993No. 13PA93PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The defendant argues that it was the duty of the State to move for the imposition of a sentence within thirty days from the time the prayer for judgment was continued and when it failed to do so, the court lost its jurisdiction to impose a sentence. We hold there is no such requirement.

When the defendant entered the guilty plea, the court had the power to continue the prayer for judgment to a later term. State v. Graham, 225 N.C. 217, 34 S.E.2d 146 (1945); N.C.G.S. § 15A-1334(a) (1988). The prayer for judgment was in effect continued from term to term when a sentence was not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. PledgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. State v. . GoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. State v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. State v. DegreeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MarinoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  2. State v. LeaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. State v. KoonceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API