Legal Opinion

Casentini v. Hines

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1981No. 11113PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent Hines filed separate actions against appellant Casentini and Ron Kincade. The actions were consolidated for purposes of trial. Prior to the completion of jury selection, the parties entered into an oral stipulation to settle the dispute. The stipulation was made in open court before District Judge Noel Manoukian. The stipulation appears in the transcript of the proceedings, but it was not entered in the minutes in the form of an order. In fact, the only order made by Judge Manoukian was that the stipulation be reduced to writing.

Thereafter, the parties were unsuccessful in…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Engelstad v. MathesonNevada Supreme Court · 1974

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc. v. Bullock Insulation, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Grisham v. GrishamNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Szilagyi v. TestaNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Resnick v. ValenteNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Humana, Inc. v. NguyenNevada Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API