Legal Opinion

Black v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1925No. 4 Div. 94PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRige, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of forgery in the second degree, and appeals.

It would serve no useful purpose to discuss the evidence. That for the state tended to show the guilt of the defendant as charged, and that for the defendant tended to show his innocence. There was no error in overruling defendant’s request for the general affirmative charge in his favor. The exceptions reserved by defendant on the admission or rejection of testimony have each been examined, and in each instance we find the trial court’s action free from prejudicial error.

The principal insistence of error…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Terrell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  4. Ex Parte BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API