Legal Opinion
State v. Caliste
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 14, 2013No. 2012-KA-1548PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROLAND L. BELSOME, Judge.
The defendant, Ivan Caliste, appeals his criminal conviction under State v. Crosby,1 asserting that the trial court incorrectly denied his motion to suppress the evidence. We affirm and remand for a correction of patent error.
STATEMENT OF CASE
The defendant was charged by bill of information with one count of possession with the intent to distribute heroin. The defendant pled not guilty at arraignment. After a hearing, the trial court denied his motion to suppress the evidence.2 The *904defendant later pled guilty to the lesser offense of simple possession of heroin,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. JeffersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State ex rel. W.V.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- State of Louisiana v. Darnell SturgentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2023
- State of Louisiana v. Jamarkus ArdoinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
- State of Louisiana v. Sharnell D. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.