Legal Opinion
Chapman v. Supplemental Benefit Retirement Plan of Lin Television Corp.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided May 23, 2012No. C.A. No. 09-518 SPublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM E. SMITH, District Judge.
Gary Chapman brought this suit pursuant to the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”), to resolve a *43dispute over the calculation of retirement benefits due to him upon his retirement from LIN Television Corporation (“LIN”). Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Chapman’s motion for summary judgment and grants LIN’s motion for summary judgment.
I. Background
Effective July 10, 2006, Plaintiff Gary Chapman resigned from…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Orndorf v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Liston v. Unum Corp. Officer Severance PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Denmark v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Wright v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. Group Benefits PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.