Legal Opinion

Zoccolo v. Stern

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Demubbeb to complaint for misjoinder of causes of action.

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

The complaint states a cause of action against Mrs. Stern. It alleges that her husband, an attorney-at-law, acting-as attorney for this plaintiff in procuring a judgment in his favor against certain parties, afterwards induced the plaintiff, by fraud,, to execute, without consideration, an assignment of the judgment to Mrs. Stern; and the action is brought, in part, to set aside such-*247assignment. It is because the complaint goes further, and seeks to restore to the plaintiff the rights in the property of his judgment debtors, of which he has been deprived by the further fraudulent acts of his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gray v. FullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Wood v. Sidney Sash, Blind & Furniture Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Crawford v. Mail & Express Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meredith v. Art Metal Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Bliss v. WintersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Curran v. HoseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  4. Bliss v. WintersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Haynes v. AbramsonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API