Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Chase

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 25, 2009No. 08-1804Published

1ConcurrenceGruender, Circuit Judge

I concur in the Court’s judgment, but I write separately because I would remand on a more limited basis. I would remand solely because of the district court’s apparent reliance on our cases requiring “extraordinary physical impairment” for a departure based on a defendant’s health to deny Chase’s request for a variance based on his health.

Subsequent to the sentencing hearing, our court affirmed another district court’s refusal to grant a downward variance by referring to the “extraordinary physical impairment” standard for health departures set forth in U.S.S.G. § 5H1.4. Charles, 531 F.3d at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartsfield v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Darrell Eugene WadenaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. MooneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API