Legal Opinion
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Francavilla
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 31, 2002No. 3:01CV2251(TPS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 1
SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Before the court is the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. #4) pursuant to Rule 65(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. (“3M”), brought this action against its former employee, defendant Sergio Franca-villa, for allegedly breaching an employment agreement (“Agreement”). 3M now seeks a preliminary injunction to enjoin the defendant from working for one of its competitors, StockerYale.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Citibank, N.A. And Citicorp v. Citytrust and Citytrust Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Genesee Brewing Company, Inc., D/B/A Highfalls Brewing Company v. Stroh Brewing Company, D/B/A Northern Plains Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Pepsico, Inc., a Corporation v. William E. Redmond, Jr., and the Quaker Oats Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Weiss v. WiederlightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fairfield County Medical Ass'n v. United HealthcareDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- TransPerfect Translations, Inc. v. LeslieDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Moore v. Commercial Aircraft Interiors, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Moore v. Commercial Aircraft Interiors, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Schipke v. Tracfone Wireless, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.