Legal Opinion

Goodenow v. Foster

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 22, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Sac District Gourt. — HoN. S. M. Elwood, Judge. This appeal is by tbe defendants from a ruling sustain' ing plaintiff’s demurrer to their answer, and the judgment rendered agalinst them for want of further pleading. — ■

1Opinion of the CourtGiveN, J.

*5101 *509— I. The petition is in two counts, in sub' stance as follows: The first alleges that between July 24 and October 13, 1898, the plaintiff performed work and labor for Herman Swanson, as engineer on a steam thresher, at two dollars per day, of which thresher Swanson was owner, and with which he was doing custom work, and that for said work there was a balance due to plaintiff of fortv-one dollars and thirty-seven cents. In the second count lie shows that there is due on a like claim seventy-six dollars and twenty-five cents for labor performed by Mel Wright as engineer on said thresher, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reynolds v. BlackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Traill v. OstermeierNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Anundsen v. Standard Printing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Heessel v. Creston National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. American Type Founders Co. v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  5. American Type Founders' Co. v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API